<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Meat Photography Uncovered in Vegan Magazine</title> <atom:link href="http://www.endlesssimmer.com/2011/04/19/meat-photography-uncovered-in-vegan-magazine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.endlesssimmer.com/2011/04/19/meat-photography-uncovered-in-vegan-magazine/</link> <description>- recipes, restaurants, food travel and everything edible</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:01:14 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator> <item><title>By: Jen</title><link>http://www.endlesssimmer.com/2011/04/19/meat-photography-uncovered-in-vegan-magazine/comment-page-1/#comment-67197</link> <dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 19:59:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.endlesssimmer.com/?p=22333#comment-67197</guid> <description><![CDATA[I think this story is ridiculous.  I&#039;ve been a vegetarian for over 16 years, and I&#039;m not offended at all that this magazine uses pictures of real meat.  It would be one thing if they were cooking meat and taking pictures of it; I think that goes against the morals of the magazine.  But using stock photographs?  I would rather them do that then to have a magazine that&#039;s void of picutres or to have to pay several extra dollars a magazine so they can pay for the photographer/studio/etc that would be necessary for taking pictures of vegan food.  I think that people who get riled up over stuff like this need to get over themselves.  Why don&#039;t you take all that animal rights outrage and do something productive with it, instead of attacking a magazine that PROMOTES your ideals?  Geesh, no wonder so many people dislike vegetarians!]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this story is ridiculous.  I&#8217;ve been a vegetarian for over 16 years, and I&#8217;m not offended at all that this magazine uses pictures of real meat.  It would be one thing if they were cooking meat and taking pictures of it; I think that goes against the morals of the magazine.  But using stock photographs?  I would rather them do that then to have a magazine that&#8217;s void of picutres or to have to pay several extra dollars a magazine so they can pay for the photographer/studio/etc that would be necessary for taking pictures of vegan food.  I think that people who get riled up over stuff like this need to get over themselves.  Why don&#8217;t you take all that animal rights outrage and do something productive with it, instead of attacking a magazine that PROMOTES your ideals?  Geesh, no wonder so many people dislike vegetarians!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BS</title><link>http://www.endlesssimmer.com/2011/04/19/meat-photography-uncovered-in-vegan-magazine/comment-page-1/#comment-67107</link> <dc:creator>BS</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 17:18:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.endlesssimmer.com/?p=22333#comment-67107</guid> <description><![CDATA[WOW this is SO scandalous. Using stock photos is one thing but how can you possibly argue that stock photos of meat when you&#039;re writing about a vegan dish is OK? It is literally the opposite of what it&#039;s supposed to be.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW this is SO scandalous. Using stock photos is one thing but how can you possibly argue that stock photos of meat when you&#8217;re writing about a vegan dish is OK? It is literally the opposite of what it&#8217;s supposed to be.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>